The Times UK has published a chart of the number of official engagements by each member of the Royal Family. Some are pretty interesting if I do say so myself!
Harrys numbers seem off. He had his whole tour in the US, Lesotho, and Australia. That had to add up to more than 25 unless they counted Lesotho as a personal thing?
I think some of those were Personal. As I said in an ask on my blog a few moments ago, a lot of the charity work Harry does, perhaps even half is private/personal so does not count. So when numbers like this are shown he comes off looking worse than he is.
God Kate looks better than him. This is such bullshit.
Harry did more negagements than Kate. So how she looks better than him?
if my math isn’t wrong, then all together she did 88 and he did 79. it sucks because i feel like they’ll count everything for her but nothing for him. like shell go to a meeting and that will count but hell walk the south pole and it doesn’t count. but my math could be wrong. i just feel like they’re always going to inflate kate and williams numbers and withhold some of harrys to make him look worse.
The coint is: A+B+C = D than D+E = Total
Kate did 44, Harry 52 and William 62
And the south polo thing was like weeks but they coint as 1 engagement.
They inflated a lot of their numbers. Kate and Will according to a Danish study, did 35 and 46 each. Philip did 120 while this claims he did 360 and considering he was off for most of the summer and then some, thats pretty much impossible. Thats why I have a hard time believing that Harrys numbers are accurate, it seems that they counted fewer of his in order to boost his brother and Kate up (that means counting meet&greets before they walk in for an event, arriving at airports, etc.).
